Learn How to Excel and Succeed as an Expert Witness
steve
About Steve Babitsky
Steven Babitsky, Esq. is the founder of SEAK, Inc., the Expert Witness Training Company. He was a personal injury trial attorney for twenty years and is the former managing partner of the firm Kistin, Babitsky, Latimer & Beitman. Steve has helped expert witnesses and their attorneys prepare for deposition in a broad range of cases, including antitrust, patent, medical malpractice, wrongful death, computer forensics, and many others. He has trained the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Aviation Administration, and he has worked with numerous forensic and financial companies including Fortune 500 companies and has
worked with numerous experts to help them expand and grow their practices. Mr. Babitsky is the co-author of the texts How to Be an Effective Expert Witness at Deposition and Trial: The SEAK Guide to Testifying as an Expert Witness, How to Be a Successful Expert Witness: SEAK’s A–Z Guide to Expert Witnessing, How to Write an Expert Witness Report, and How to Market Your Expert Witness Practice Evidence-Based Practices. Attorney Babitsky is the co-developer and trainer for the “How to Be an Effective Expert Witness” seminar and has been the seminar leader since 1990 for the Annual National Expert Witness and Litigation Conference.
***The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information.***
The 5 Biggest Reasons Expert Witnesses Don’t Get Paid Steven Babitsky, Esq. As a consultant to expert witnesses, I receive calls about assistance in deposition and trial preparation, report writing, Daubert issues, etc. However, by far the most frequent issue expert witnesses call about is their failure to be paid promptly and in full [...]
An expert witness testifying on causation should directly deal with the issue of alternative causes. The US Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) in Schultz v. Akzo Nobel Paints, LLC, 721 F. 3d 426 dealt with a painter who developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and later died. The lower court granted a motion for summary judgment [...]
When a witness testifies as to both facts and expert opinions, the court will treat him as a dual capacity expert. The court, in US v. Tucker, 714 F. 3d 1006 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2013 dealt with an appeal of a drug conviction. The court upheld the conviction finding that a properly [...]
The US Court of Appeals in US v. Ignasiak, 667 F. 3d 1217 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 2012 reversed the conviction of a physician for health care fraud (dispensing controlled substances.) The court found that the government improperly withheld crucial information about a medical expert who “regularly” testified for the government. The court [...]
Expert witnesses testifying at deposition are entitled to fees for: Deposition preparation Travel to and from the deposition Time spent reviewing the deposition transcript The US Court of Appeals in Halasa v. ITT Educational Services, Inc., 690 F. 3d 844 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2012 upheld the award of $2,955 to the [...]
How much time are expert witnesses testifying at deposition permitted to charge for preparation time? In the absence of time sheets documenting the actual time spent, some courts have adopted a rule of thumb (i.e. 3 hours preparation for each hour expert testifies.) The court, in EL CAMINO RESOURCES, LTD. v. Huntington National Bank, Dist. [...]
Videotaped depositions of expert witnesses are being used with increased frequency. During impeachment, clips from a videotaped deposition can make a dramatic impression on the jury or fact finder. Preparing an expert for videotaped deposition means you will have to concern yourself with the additional issues of the expert’s: • General appearance, • Distracting or [...]
Expert witnesses of all disciplines actually have more at risk during their depositions than the lawyers who retain them. While trial lawyers may have dozens or even hundreds of cases they are working on, the experts they retain whether they be medical experts, patent experts, psychologists etc. only have one reputation at risk each time [...]
By Steve Babitsky|2023-07-10T09:04:14-04:00December 30th, 2013|Blog, Testimony|Comments Off on Expert Witnesses Are At Risk During Depositions: 5 Things To Watch Out For
Opposing counsel generally can have one or more overall objectives for deposing an expert witness. Counsel may want to set up the expert for a Daubert challenge or use his answers for another pre-trial motion. Opposing counsel can be expected to prepare very diligently for an expert’s deposition. To excel, your expert must prepare as [...]
By Steve Babitsky|2023-07-10T09:04:21-04:00December 24th, 2013|Blog, Testimony|Comments Off on How Attorneys Can Explain the Strategies and Goals of Opposing Counsel to Your Expert Witness
It is usually important to explain to your expert witness some of the rules and procedures governing depositions and why these are important to the expert witness. The authors have found that even very experienced expert witnesses often do not appreciate the law and procedures governing depositions, such as: • “Off the record” merely means that the [...]