Expert witnesses are increasingly being challenged, and in many cases being disqualified under Daubert. When attorneys suspect retaining counsel has effectively “written” the expert’s report, attorneys are using this to pursue disqualification of the expert. In the case of MOBILE MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, v. ADVANCED MOBILE HOSPITAL SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 2:07-cv-231, United States District [...]
Experience and successful expert witnesses are now often using demonstrative evidence such as powerpoints, models, videos, animations, photographs, 3D laser data, etc. during their direct examination. This demonstrative evidence needs to be presented to counsel and approved by the Judge prior to its use. Effective demonstrative evidence can turn a dry recitation of the science [...]
Expert witnesses are all too often going into depositions, hearings, and trials with little or no preparation from counsel. As a consultant who helps prepare expert witnesses for depositions and trials, I always ask the expert: How much preparation did the retaining lawyer provide you? The answers range from: - None - Spoke for 30 [...]
While many expert witnesses and trial attorneys focus their time on prepping for cross-examination, the key to success often lies in a powerful persuasive direct examination. Expert witnesses want to work with retaining counsel to: Humanize the expert. Lay out an interesting and persuasive narrative. Diffuse any damaging information that is likely to arise during [...]
North Carolina Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 26(b)(4) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, experts in North Carolina may only be subject to deposition, or any form of discovery beyond interrogatories exchanged by the parties, upon court order. Such an order will be granted where a party’s disclosures [...]
Michigan Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 2.302(4)(a)(ii) of the Michigan Court Rules, experts who are expected to testify at trial may be deposed. Michigan laws and rules do not specify a time limit for depositions, but Rule 2.306(B)(2) provides that the court may increase or decrease the time allowed for [...]
Georgia Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Georgia Code, experts who are expected to testify at trial may be deposed in the same manner as any other witness. Oral depositions are governed by § 9-11-30, which does not provide a general time limit for depositions, but does state [...]
Ohio Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Ohio rules and cases are not explicit regarding the availability of deposition for experts. However, it seems that most authorities on Ohio law treat the vague reference to further discovery of testifying experts in Rule 26(B)(5)(b) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure as making depositions [...]
Pennsylvania Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Under Rule 4003.5(a)(2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, experts may only be subject to deposition “[u]pon cause shown.” Such a finding of cause appears to be exceedingly rare in Pennsylvania. For an example of a Pennsylvania case in which sufficient cause was shown to [...]
Illinois Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories Testifying experts may be subject to deposition in Illinois. Under Rule 206(d) of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules, depositions are generally limited to three hours. Experts retained only for consulting purposes, on the other hand, may only be subject to discovery under exceptional circumstances as described below, [...]